<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Security Debrief &#187; Cybersecurity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://securitydebrief.com/category/air-infrastructure/cyber-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://securitydebrief.com</link>
	<description>Homland security news and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:53:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>DHS in need of &#8216;some soul-searching&#8217; after departures</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/21/dhs-in-need-of-some-soul-searching-after-departures/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/21/dhs-in-need-of-some-soul-searching-after-departures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=14343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.), the ranking member of the House subcommittee on cybersecurity, told Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials in an oversight hearing on Thursday that she was concerned over the string of departures of senior cybersecurity officials in the past six months.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/21/dhs-in-need-of-some-soul-searching-after-departures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Improvements Seen In Public-Private Collaboration On Cybersecurity</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/20/improvements-seen-in-public-private-collaboration-on-cybersecurity-initiatives/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/20/improvements-seen-in-public-private-collaboration-on-cybersecurity-initiatives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=14327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cybersecurity initiatives dependent upon collaboration with the private sector at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) have advanced rapidly in the past year, DHS officials told Congress last week. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/20/improvements-seen-in-public-private-collaboration-on-cybersecurity-initiatives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rising cyberattacks boosts security tech sales</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/20/rising-cyberattacks-boosts-security-tech-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/20/rising-cyberattacks-boosts-security-tech-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=14321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rising cyberthreats are translating into booming business for companies supplying technologies that help secure networks and protect sensitive data. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/20/rising-cyberattacks-boosts-security-tech-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How I &#8216;stole&#8217; $14 million from a bank</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/15/how-i-stole-14-million-from-a-bank/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/15/how-i-stole-14-million-from-a-bank/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 17:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=14294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In early 2010, Nish Bhalla sat down at his computer with one objective: steal a huge amount of money from a bank. It wasn't a typical heist.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/15/how-i-stole-14-million-from-a-bank/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top U.S. admiral puts cyber security on the Navy&#8217;s radar</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/13/top-u-s-admiral-puts-cyber-security-on-the-navys-radar/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/13/top-u-s-admiral-puts-cyber-security-on-the-navys-radar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 14:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=14269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cyber security and warfare are on par with a credible nuclear deterrent in the defense priorities of the United States, the U.S. Navy's top admiral said on Monday, after the Pentagon accused China of trying to hack into its computer networks.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/13/top-u-s-admiral-puts-cyber-security-on-the-navys-radar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tough Times at Homeland Security</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/13/tough-times-at-homeland-security/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/13/tough-times-at-homeland-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 14:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=14266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new wave of cyberattacks is hitting American companies at a particularly vulnerable time for the Department of Homeland Security, the federal agency charged with fending them off.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/13/tough-times-at-homeland-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. warns industry of heightened risk of cyberattack</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/10/u-s-warns-industry-of-heightened-risk-of-cyberattack/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/10/u-s-warns-industry-of-heightened-risk-of-cyberattack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 13:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critical Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=14256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. government on Thursday warned of a heightened risk of a cyberattack that could disrupt the control systems of U.S. companies providing critical services such as electricity and water.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/10/u-s-warns-industry-of-heightened-risk-of-cyberattack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Homeland Security Working to Fight Cyberattacks, Napolitano Says</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/09/homeland-security-working-to-fight-cyberattacks-napolitano-says/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/09/homeland-security-working-to-fight-cyberattacks-napolitano-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 17:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=14241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Obama administration is working “full-bore” on helping the business and government agencies confront the threat of cyberattacks, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/09/homeland-security-working-to-fight-cyberattacks-napolitano-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unexpected Risks of Intelligent Infrastructure</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/04/24/unexpected-risks-of-intelligent-infrastructure/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/04/24/unexpected-risks-of-intelligent-infrastructure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air & Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=14139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 1999 a technology manager called Kevin Ashton coined the phrase “The Internet of Things”. Today, these “things” now include elements of our critical national infrastructure via what are called SCADA (Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition) systems or ICS (Industrial Control Systems). Unfortunately, these systems can be just as vulnerable to attack as our laptops.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/04/24/unexpected-risks-of-intelligent-infrastructure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Cyber Tensions On The Rise</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/04/23/global-cyber-tensions-on-the-rise/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/04/23/global-cyber-tensions-on-the-rise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critical Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=14130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senior US intelligence officials, including Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and National Security Agency (NSA) Director, Army Gen. Keith Alexander, last month continued the cyberwar drumbeat with warnings to Congress that the US is woefully unprepared for a major cyberattack against critical infrastructures.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/04/23/global-cyber-tensions-on-the-rise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Duck Quacks but are We at Cyber War?</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/04/15/the-duck-quacks-but-are-we-at-cyber-war/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/04/15/the-duck-quacks-but-are-we-at-cyber-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 17:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Marks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military and Homeland Defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=14084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have heard the saying, if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and looks like a duck, it must be a duck.  News sources and government officials tell us we live in a world of constant cyber attack, so we must be at war, right? In cyber world, this kind of talk is harmful and obscures the new world in which we really exist.  We are not at war – we are in conflict, and some of the tools we are using cross interesting and controversial 20th-century political lines.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/04/15/the-duck-quacks-but-are-we-at-cyber-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lost in Translation in a Strange Cyber Land</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/03/26/lost-in-translation-in-a-strange-cyber-land/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/03/26/lost-in-translation-in-a-strange-cyber-land/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Marks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=14032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I attend various meetings around DC on cyber issues, I often see confusion and challenge – good people trying to resolve confusing issues,  wrestling with individual – as well as the country’s – social and political demons. Cyber is a new kind of land. It has no physical dimension. There are no borders or boundaries, and everyone seems to be a part of something that no one can control. People in DC are bit lost right now, and there are some distinct cultural reasons why.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/03/26/lost-in-translation-in-a-strange-cyber-land/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Cyber Elephant and How to Tame It</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/03/04/the-cyber-elephant-and-how-to-tame-it/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/03/04/the-cyber-elephant-and-how-to-tame-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 12:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Marks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties and Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety and Physical Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Rule of Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=14009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Jainists of India have a parable. It is the story about the blind men feeling the elephant – each one feels something different. Watching the Federal government roll out a cyber “strategy” over the past couple of week has felt just that way. The cyber-elephant is a vast and ever-expanding body, and Washington is mucking around this way because of two basic problems. In its simplistic form, the first challenge is definitional and the second challenge is doctrinal.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/03/04/the-cyber-elephant-and-how-to-tame-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Politics of Fear &#8211; Is a Cyber Attack Really Imminent?</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/02/20/the-politics-of-fear-is-a-cyber-attack-really-imminent/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/02/20/the-politics-of-fear-is-a-cyber-attack-really-imminent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>L. Vance Taylor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=13982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[National security leaders like Leon Panetta, Janet Napolitano and even President Obama have been telling members of Congress and the country that unless immediate action is taken, the United States will suffer cyber attacks guaranteed to shut down our power, communication, financial and water infrastructure sectors. Well, I’m not buying it. The politics of fear is a D.C. classic.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/02/20/the-politics-of-fear-is-a-cyber-attack-really-imminent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Piracy on the Cyber High Seas</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/02/04/piracy-on-the-cyber-high-seas/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/02/04/piracy-on-the-cyber-high-seas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 15:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Marks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=13975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times recently admitted it had been raided by Chinese “privateers,” stealing reporter’s notes and sources. With this act by the Chinese, we now face clearly the idea that a nation-state can try to enforce its will on an individual private actor inside the United States. Moreover, they have done so to an actor that is not a part of the national security or industrial base. This act must be responded to swiftly and aggressively. And Washington seems not yet prepared to deal with it.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/02/04/piracy-on-the-cyber-high-seas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cyber Déjà vu All Over Again &#8211; Challenges in 2013</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/01/08/cyber-challenges-2013/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/01/08/cyber-challenges-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 14:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Marks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=13955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yogi Berra once observed after two of his teammates smacked back to back homers, “it was déjà vu all over again.” His wisdom applies to cyberspace in 2013 – it is going to be déjà vu all over again. Here are four likely Cyber Challenges we will encounter this year. None of these challenges are “fatal.” They are simply the challenges at hand. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/01/08/cyber-challenges-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not Your Father&#8217;s Internet &#8211; Mounting Digital Challenges in 2012</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/12/10/not-your-fathers-internet-mounting-digital-challenges-in-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/12/10/not-your-fathers-internet-mounting-digital-challenges-in-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Marks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management and Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military and Homeland Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resilience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=13922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are few spots left around the world without Internet access, and few people who cannot reach out to access it. It has been relatively free of state interference and American dominated. However, the Net has had mounting problems, and 2012 has marked the end of the old Internet as we knew it. The days of an American-controlled freewheeling Internet with unlimited access and relatively cost-free access are over.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/12/10/not-your-fathers-internet-mounting-digital-challenges-in-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Homeland Security &#8211; What Next?</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/11/01/homeland-security-what-next/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/11/01/homeland-security-what-next/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 12:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Security Debrief</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ports and Borders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety and Physical Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public/Private]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=13869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Doug Doan
So far, none of the presidential candidates have mentioned much about Homeland Security. With so many other problems, issues surrounding how best to organize, manage and lead the vast DHS bureaucracy are just not that important. Too bad. I would have liked to see the candidates talk about what they might do. Here is an agenda that I happily provide.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/11/01/homeland-security-what-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cybersecurity Is Not A Partisan Issue</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/10/18/cybersecurity-is-not-a-partisan-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/10/18/cybersecurity-is-not-a-partisan-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=13833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and his congressional colleagues’ proposed Cyber Security Act of 2012 is the wrong solution for America's cybersecurity problem. The split is not between Democrats and Republicans; it is between competing views of the way to better security. The main reason these efforts are wrong is that they are based on a regulatory model. This sort of solution is a 19th-century answer for a 21st-century problem.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/10/18/cybersecurity-is-not-a-partisan-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Real Danger of a BYOD Strategy</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/10/15/the-real-danger-of-a-byod-strategy/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/10/15/the-real-danger-of-a-byod-strategy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 19:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Mattice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public/Private]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=13826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many companies are examining the possibility of switching to Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) as a method of significantly reducing their IT infrastructure capital costs. Here is but another example of how short-term versus strategic thinking is creating havoc in American business. The dangers associated with BYOD far outweigh the short-term benefits. Convenience and a perception of cost reductions appear to again be trumping sound security practices. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/10/15/the-real-danger-of-a-byod-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
