<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Security Debrief &#187; Intelligence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://securitydebrief.com/category/intelligence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://securitydebrief.com</link>
	<description>Homland security news and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:26:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Intelligence Led Policing &#8211; What&#8217;s in a Name?</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/02/02/intelligence-led-policing-whats-in-a-name/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/02/02/intelligence-led-policing-whats-in-a-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Serrao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Enforcement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=12821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had the privilege of recently attending a two-day seminar on Intelligence Led Policing (ILP). Law enforcement officials and academics educated participants on the tenets of ILP and how to better equip officers to begin to use ILP in their police departments. Regardless of what it’s called – be it ILP, smart policing or predictive analytics – the best practice comes down to this: Police gather information, they evaluate and analyze that information, and they create a threat assessment. That information and resulting analysis drive the agency’s strategy and its actions.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/02/02/intelligence-led-policing-whats-in-a-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hizballah Poised to Strike in Southeast Asia</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/01/18/hizballah-poised-to-strike-in-southeast-asia/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/01/18/hizballah-poised-to-strike-in-southeast-asia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 04:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Levitt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Counter Terrorism and Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=12732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, Thai police arrested Atris Hussein, a suspected Hizballah operative, at the Bangkok airport, while another suspect escaped. Elsewhere in the capital, authorities seized a large cache of chemical explosives composed of ammonium nitrate and urea fertilizer. These discoveries of Hizballah bombmaking in Thailand are no surprise given the group's long history of terrorist operations in Southeast Asia.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/01/18/hizballah-poised-to-strike-in-southeast-asia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Loose Lips Sink Ships</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/01/17/loose-lips-sink-ships/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/01/17/loose-lips-sink-ships/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Rosenfeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=12718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the Second World War, the iconic phrase "loose lips sink ships" summed up the need for keeping information that could be useful to the enemy to only those who need it. It’s 70 years later and the social imperative for who needs information has diametrically changed. On any social networking site, there are opportunities for our enemies to identify us and use that information to plan attacks, both physical and cyber.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/01/17/loose-lips-sink-ships/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DHS officially welcomed to SpyWorld</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/01/09/dhs-officially-welcomed-to-spyworld/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/01/09/dhs-officially-welcomed-to-spyworld/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/2012/01/10/dhs-officially-welcomed-to-spyworld/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intelligence bill makes DHS I&#38;A officially part of spook group &#8211; FierceHomelandSecurity The fiscal 2012 intelligence community authorization bill signed into law Jan. 3 by President Obama officially codifies the Homeland Security Department&#8217;s Office of Intelligence and Analysis as part of that community.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/01/09/dhs-officially-welcomed-to-spyworld/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Intelligence Challenge of Cyberspace</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/12/13/the-intelligence-challenge-of-cyberspace/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/12/13/the-intelligence-challenge-of-cyberspace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Marks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=12574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[America’s intelligence community finds itself pressed to deal with the “Wild West” frontier of an ever-expanding cyber space. From Twitter to blogs to e-mail, the changes are coming hard and fast for governments, businesses and individuals worldwide. The challenges for the American policy maker and the intelligence community are simple and yet hugely complex. So far, by our own admission, we appear not to be passing the grade.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/12/13/the-intelligence-challenge-of-cyberspace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New legislation would allow spy agencies to share cyber threat info with private sector</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/12/01/new-legislation-would-allow-spy-agencies-to-share-cyber-threat-info-with-private-sector/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/12/01/new-legislation-would-allow-spy-agencies-to-share-cyber-threat-info-with-private-sector/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 20:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/2011/12/01/new-legislation-would-allow-spy-agencies-to-share-cyber-threat-info-with-private-sector/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DailyTech &#8211; New Bill Urges U.S. Intelligence Agencies to Share Cyber Threat Info with Private Sector Members of the U.S. House intelligence committee have proposed a bill that would allow private firms to receive&#160;cyber threat-related information&#160;from government agencies such as the National Security Agency (NSA).]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/12/01/new-legislation-would-allow-spy-agencies-to-share-cyber-threat-info-with-private-sector/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Son of Stuxnet &#8211; What Does Duqu Mean?</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/10/26/son-of-stuxnet-what-does-duqu-mean/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/10/26/son-of-stuxnet-what-does-duqu-mean/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=12264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recently identified “Duqu” worm has raised a whole new set of issues. Seemingly a variant of the Stuxnet malware that got so much of the world’s attention, everyone is trying to figure out what it “means.” Stuxnet opened a new window, and Duqu is only the first of many. The rub is, unlike Stuxnet, which targeted Iranian centrifuges, Duqu may be coming directly at you and your systems.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/10/26/son-of-stuxnet-what-does-duqu-mean/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A History of Violence &#8211; Does anyone still doubt Iran is a terrorist state?</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/10/18/a-history-of-violence-does-anyone-still-doubt-iran-is-a-terrorist-state/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/10/18/a-history-of-violence-does-anyone-still-doubt-iran-is-a-terrorist-state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Levitt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Counter Terrorism and Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=12172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder's announcement that a dual U.S.-Iranian citizen and a commander in Iran's Quds Force had been charged in New York for their alleged roles in a plot to murder the Saudi ambassador to the United States, Adel al-Jubeir, represents a brazen escalation in Iran's struggle for regional dominance. But Iran's willingness to use brutal means to achieve its foreign-policy goals is nothing new: Since the creation of the Islamic Republic, U.S. intelligence agencies have repeatedly identified terrorism as one of the regime's signature calling cards.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/10/18/a-history-of-violence-does-anyone-still-doubt-iran-is-a-terrorist-state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mounting Questions on Iran Terror Plot</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/10/13/mounting-questions-on-iran-terror-plot/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/10/13/mounting-questions-on-iran-terror-plot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 02:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Counter Terrorism and Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/2011/10/13/mounting-questions-on-iran-terror-plot/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mounting Questions on Iran Terror Plot &#8211; Council on Foreign Relations Kenneth Katzman, an Iran expert at the Congressional Research Service, says he and many of his peers believe that elements of the plan&#8211;such as the alleged intent to use a Mexican drug cartel to carry out the killing&#8211;simply don&#8217;t comport with what they know [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/10/13/mounting-questions-on-iran-terror-plot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media Accounts of Violence in Cairo Challenge Official Narrative</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/10/12/social-media-accounts-of-violence-in-cairo-challenge-official-narrative/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/10/12/social-media-accounts-of-violence-in-cairo-challenge-official-narrative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 02:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR, Social Media and Govt 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radicalization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/2011/10/12/social-media-accounts-of-violence-in-cairo-challenge-official-narrative/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Social Media Accounts of Violence in Cairo Challenge Official Narrative &#8211; NYTimes.com Although Egypt&#8217;s prime minister, Essam Sharaf, hinted darkly that the violence had been orchestrated as part of a foreign plot to inflame sectarian tensions, some witnesses to the mayhem claimed in accounts posted on social media Web sites that the military had used [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/10/12/social-media-accounts-of-violence-in-cairo-challenge-official-narrative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>omeland Security moves forward with pre-crime detection</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/10/10/omeland-security-moves-forward-with-pre-crime-detection/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/10/10/omeland-security-moves-forward-with-pre-crime-detection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 02:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties and Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/2011/10/10/omeland-security-moves-forward-with-pre-crime-detection/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Homeland Security moves forward with pre-crime detection : Homeland Security News An internal U.S. Department of Homeland Security document indicates that a controversial program designed to predict whether a person will commit a crime is already being tested on some members of the public voluntarily, CNET has learned. If this sounds a bit like the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/10/10/omeland-security-moves-forward-with-pre-crime-detection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our &#8220;Overreaction&#8221; To 9/11</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/09/12/our-overreaction-to-911/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/09/12/our-overreaction-to-911/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Counter Terrorism and Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management and Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=11935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a great deal of intellectual froth over the subject of the tenth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. Numerous editorials cover the entire intellectual waterfront. Most focus on the continuing sense of loss and grief we feel and ask us to never forget. There is a different group I have a problem with, those who say America “overreacted” to 9/11. I was in the Pentagon on 9/11, and so was my wife. I know in my heart as well as my head. Our leaders didn’t overreact; they did exactly what was needed.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/09/12/our-overreaction-to-911/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Real New Middle East Order – Part IV: &#8220;An Emerging New Order&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/09/07/the-real-new-middle-east-order-%e2%80%93-part-iv-an-emerging-new-order/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/09/07/the-real-new-middle-east-order-%e2%80%93-part-iv-an-emerging-new-order/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 15:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Akram Elias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=11901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What has been termed the “Arab Spring” could potentially pose the gravest challenge the United States has ever faced in the Middle East. Yet, when one tracks the reactions and positions of the US foreign policy establishment, one is left with a state of confusion and bewilderment. In this fourth part of The Real New Middle East Order series, we will resume the process of explaining the Real New Middle East Order focusing on the post-9/11 period.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/09/07/the-real-new-middle-east-order-%e2%80%93-part-iv-an-emerging-new-order/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weapons of Mass Destruction &#8211; A Dangerous and Uncertain Future</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/25/weapons-of-mass-destruction-a-dangerous-and-uncertain-future/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/25/weapons-of-mass-destruction-a-dangerous-and-uncertain-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Counter Terrorism and Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD, Chemical and Biological]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=11826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The present, predominant view that Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) is confined to Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and High Yield Explosives (CBRNE) only is now passé.  Many people do not even include the “E”.  This is far too narrow a view! At least two other categories must be included in the pantheon of WMD. These are cyber weapons and economic warfare.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/25/weapons-of-mass-destruction-a-dangerous-and-uncertain-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9/11 Conspiracy, Clarke Comments Generate Response</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/18/911-conspiracy-clarke-comments-generate-response/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/18/911-conspiracy-clarke-comments-generate-response/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Counter Terrorism and Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=11778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My recent post on Richard Clarke has generated a lot of interest in discussion. I was fortunate to get a response from the people behind the controversial interview with Mr. Clarke, including a link to a YouTube video of the interview. Despite the new materials they have shared, I still want to see the proof behind the charges that have been made.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/18/911-conspiracy-clarke-comments-generate-response/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>September 11, 2000 – Just Another Day</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/17/september-11-2000-%e2%80%93-just-another-day/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/17/september-11-2000-%e2%80%93-just-another-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erroll Southers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Counter Terrorism and Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management and Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=11755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[September 11, 2000 began as just another day for the United States and much of the world. Ten years after the September 11 terrorist attacks, sometimes it seems like as a country, we have remembered the date but lost the lesson. Every day is common until the unthinkable occurs, and when it happens, collective efforts are what help us bounce back, in most cases stronger than before. Yet, America is more polarized today than it has been in a generation. We cannot control the threat, but we can control our reaction. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/17/september-11-2000-%e2%80%93-just-another-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The End of Richard Clarke &#8211; A Response</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/17/the-end-of-richard-clarke-a-response/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/17/the-end-of-richard-clarke-a-response/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Hienz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Counter Terrorism and Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=11760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fellow Security Debrief contributor Rich Cooper recently posted a piece about comments Richard Clarke made in an upcoming documentary, in which he suggests former CIA Director George Tenet and others led a cover-up to keep from the White House and FBI intelligence that could have stopped the 9/11 attacks. Not having heard Clarke’s statements on the forthcoming documentary, I cannot speak to the validity or falsehood of his claims. But I respectfully disagree with Cooper that such unproven statements constitute the end of a distinguished career, or at least, the end of the days of informed statements.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/17/the-end-of-richard-clarke-a-response/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9/11 Conspiracy Theories and the End of Richard Clarke</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/17/911-conspiracy-theories-and-the-end-of-richard-clarke/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/17/911-conspiracy-theories-and-the-end-of-richard-clarke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 12:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Counter Terrorism and Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=11747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The homeland security and national security community is full of all types of personalities, and there are few personalities as polarizing as Richard Clarke. As a former senior official, he made quite the reputation for himself. Clarke has never shied away from making headlines or making waves. In an upcoming documentary, Clarke points a finger at former CIA Director George Tenet claiming the CIA conducted a cover-up to hide information about the 9/11 terrorist attacks from the White House and FBI. Whether he’s anxious to be on the media circuit in the pre-9/11 anniversary days or just anxious to burn any remaining bridges he has left to former colleagues, Clarke’s charges are slanderous without any proof.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/17/911-conspiracy-theories-and-the-end-of-richard-clarke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Brother and the Thought Police</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/11/big-brother-and-the-thought-police/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/11/big-brother-and-the-thought-police/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Macisco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Counter Terrorism and Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=11724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the past several years, DHS has quietly been testing various forms of advanced technology to identify, detect and deter criminal and/or terrorist acts before they happen. It appears DHS is trying to emulate the Tom Cruise movie “Minority Report.” Yet, several experts believe that relying on the current technology will create many false positives, targeting innocent people for additional questioning and slowing down security queues at busy airports. We don’t need to waste scarce government monetary resources trying to develop "thought crime software."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/11/big-brother-and-the-thought-police/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Years On – Pausing to Remember 9/11</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/10/10-years-on-%e2%80%93-pausing-to-remember-911/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/10/10-years-on-%e2%80%93-pausing-to-remember-911/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Serrao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Counter Terrorism and Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management and Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=11715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the 10-year mark since the attacks of September 11 approaches, the images I saw from my house across the Hudson River are still fresh in my mind. It was a defining moment for our country. The event took friends from us too soon, changed our ideas of safety, changed our understanding of the vulnerabilities in our systems, and had a profound impact on all of us, both as individuals and as a country. As we approach the 10-year commemorative, we pause to reflect the journey 10 years on.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/10/10-years-on-%e2%80%93-pausing-to-remember-911/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

