<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Security Debrief &#187; State and Local</title>
	<atom:link href="http://securitydebrief.com/category/public-private/homeland-state-local/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://securitydebrief.com</link>
	<description>Homland security news and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:26:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cybersecurity Incentives &#8211; What do We Have, What do We Need?</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/06/11/cybersecurity-incentives-what-do-we-have-what-do-we-need/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/06/11/cybersecurity-incentives-what-do-we-have-what-do-we-need/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Security Debrief</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critical Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State and Local]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=14425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Mike Beland
The implementation of President Obama’s executive order on cybersecurity is appropriately turning to incentives. These ideas makes sense; for the framework under the EO to decrease our nation’s risk from cyber threats, however, the incentives will actually have to realize meaningful adoption of standards among critical infrastructure owners and operators. As they say, the Devil’s in the details, and the details are where this laudable focus on incentives will need to motivate companies to adopt the EO framework. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/06/11/cybersecurity-incentives-what-do-we-have-what-do-we-need/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not in My Graveyard &#8211; The Problem with Dead Terrorists</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/21/not-in-my-graveyard-the-problem-with-dead-terrorists/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/21/not-in-my-graveyard-the-problem-with-dead-terrorists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Hienz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Public/Private]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State and Local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Rule of Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=14331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Boston Marathon bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev buried in a Virginia cemetery, the question of what to do with his body is answered. Yet, for more than a week, it was the subject of heated public debate. The case of Tsarnaev raises intriguing questions. What should be done with the bodies of mass murderers? Why are they such a point of contentious debate? Would there have been a similar outcry if Tsarnaev self-identified as Sovereign Citizen or Neo-Nazi? ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/21/not-in-my-graveyard-the-problem-with-dead-terrorists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security for Critical Water Infrastructure – How About Some Help for the Little Guy</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/02/security-for-critical-water-infrastructure-how-about-some-help-for-the-little-guy/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/02/security-for-critical-water-infrastructure-how-about-some-help-for-the-little-guy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 15:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>L. Vance Taylor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critical Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety and Physical Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State and Local]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=14191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an era of diminished budgets and vanishing security grants, a recent break in at the Carters Lake Water Treatment Plant in Georgia highlights how the federal government is leaving small water systems, and the communities they serve, hanging in the wind. I’m not suggesting DHS throw obscene amounts of money at rural water systems, but I would argue that these systems can make major strides with small amounts of money.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/05/02/security-for-critical-water-infrastructure-how-about-some-help-for-the-little-guy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Daily Business Stops &#8211; The Cost of the Boston Bombings</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/04/24/business-cost-boston-bombings/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/04/24/business-cost-boston-bombings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Public/Private]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resilience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State and Local]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=14134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the Boston area recovers from the tragic and unprecedented events of the past week, the lessons learned will be far reaching.  Emergency management professionals, like their counterparts in law enforcement, are pretty good culturally at pulling together “after-action” reports that chronicle what they did right and what they can do better next time. Those lessons learned will offer new chapters to study and consider in terms of planning and preparations for any future incidents of this magnitude but in terms of the private sector, there are a number of lessons learned that need to be studied as well. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2013/04/24/business-cost-boston-bombings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Lingering Shadow of &#8220;That Day&#8221; – Business Preparedness Lessons from 9/11</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/09/11/business-preparedness-lessons-911/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/09/11/business-preparedness-lessons-911/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emergency Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public/Private]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State and Local]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=13718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For anyone alive eleven years ago, September 11 will always be a date on the calendar when you immediately remember where you were and what you were doing when all hell broke loose. History records many unforgettable days, but as the rawness of that day’s memories ebbs, the lessons learned continue to ripple in many ways. In the discussion on safety and security, one of the often-overlooked aspects is the impact that day had on business. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/09/11/business-preparedness-lessons-911/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FBI/DHS Inaccuracy Could Lead to Police Over-Reaction</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/08/25/fbidhs-inaccuracy-could-lead-to-police-over-reaction/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/08/25/fbidhs-inaccuracy-could-lead-to-police-over-reaction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 21:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Rosenfeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety and Physical Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State and Local]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=13627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a great deal of media coverage relating to an FBI/DHS document detailing likely anarchist activity during the Republican and Democratic National Conventions. The vast majority of that coverage has related to the threat of anarchists using Molotov cocktails, acid filled eggs, or even IEDs and IIDs. It appears an FBI/DHS report over-states and sensationalizes some of the likely threats from anarchists, as most recently expressed in their Joint Intelligence Bulletin released August 21, 2012. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/08/25/fbidhs-inaccuracy-could-lead-to-police-over-reaction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Worrying Signs From Tampa &#8211; Protest Management at the RNC</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/08/14/worrying-signs-from-tampa-protest-management-at-the-rnc/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/08/14/worrying-signs-from-tampa-protest-management-at-the-rnc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Rosenfeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety and Physical Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State and Local]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=13534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s not easy being the police department responsible for hosting a National Special Security Event (NSSE). The fundamental requirement for a police department hosting an NSSE is to understand the threat so the response is proportionate and effective. Anarchists and Extreme Left Wing groups are not synonymous with protesters, but in the effort to combat the former, law-abiding protesters are often dragged into the fray. Signals from Tampa in advance of the Republican National Convention suggest the planned police response does not understand the threat.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/08/14/worrying-signs-from-tampa-protest-management-at-the-rnc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>G8 Move Doesn&#8217;t Reduce Chicago Protests</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/03/06/g8-move-doesnt-reduce-chicago-protests/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/03/06/g8-move-doesnt-reduce-chicago-protests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 19:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Rosenfeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety and Physical Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State and Local]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=12974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night, protest organizers for Chicago G8 were celebrating their perceived victory of the move of the G8 to Camp David. However, despite what seems to be a common perception, the move will not affect the protests in Chicago. There are a number of serious issues facing Chicago Police, including their tactics and command preparation and the attendance of the anarchist community.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/03/06/g8-move-doesnt-reduce-chicago-protests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Resiliency and the Great Central U.S. Shakeout</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/01/31/resiliency-and-the-great-central-u-s-shakeout/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/01/31/resiliency-and-the-great-central-u-s-shakeout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest Contributor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emergency Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State and Local]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=12802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Jay Alan

At some point during my day I can usually see the scaffolding atop the landmark National Cathedral here in Washington, D.C. -- a reminder of damage from the August earthquake.  And a reminder that disaster can strike anywhere at anytime. We all know and preach the doctrine of preparedness, but building resiliency and knowledge takes time. This effort takes another great step forward on Feb. 7.  The Great Central U.S. Shakeout will occur at 10:15am CST, with (as of this writing) 1.7 million people in nine states practicing the ‘duck, cover and hold’ earthquake drill.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/01/31/resiliency-and-the-great-central-u-s-shakeout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Rules on GPS Surveillance</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/01/25/supreme-court-rules-on-gps-surveillance/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/01/25/supreme-court-rules-on-gps-surveillance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 22:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Security Debrief</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State and Local]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=12762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Seth Stodder
This week, the Supreme Court dipped its toes into the muddy waters of how modern surveillance technologies – in this case, GPS tracking – fit within the 200-year-old confines of the Fourth Amendment. In United States v. Jones, the Court ruled that the DC Police and the FBI violated the Fourth Amendment when they placed a GPS tracker on a Jeep Cherokee driven by criminal suspect Antoine Jones, and then tracked it for 28 days – all without a valid search warrant. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/01/25/supreme-court-rules-on-gps-surveillance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Magic Weapon for Crowd Management</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/01/13/no-magic-weapon-for-crowd-management/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/01/13/no-magic-weapon-for-crowd-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Rosenfeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State and Local]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=12700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The makers of Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) have reported significant increases in sales following the Occupy Movement’s first phase of activity last year. Some, I suspect, think they’re buying a magic crowd management weapon. Yet, the best deterrent to truly criminal behavior is to identify criminals, such as those committing or inciting violence, gathering evidence against them, and successfully arresting and prosecuting them. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/01/13/no-magic-weapon-for-crowd-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Stark Reminder – Cyber Threats Are Real</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/11/23/cyber-threats-real/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/11/23/cyber-threats-real/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>L. Vance Taylor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critical Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State and Local]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=12411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ As happy/relieved as I am to know that the Russians aren’t out to disrupt our water services, it is important to note that a water system in South Houston was the victim of a real cyber attack. (You’ll recall it occurred in direct response to DHS downplaying of the reported situation in Illinois).The would-be attack, and the actual one, are stark reminders that the threat of cyber attacks are real.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/11/23/cyber-threats-real/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYPD&#8217;s Raymond Kelly: Can&#8217;t Wait Around for the FBI</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/11/21/nypds-raymond-kelly-cant-wait-around-for-the-fbi/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/11/21/nypds-raymond-kelly-cant-wait-around-for-the-fbi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 02:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Counter Terrorism and Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State and Local]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/2011/11/21/nypds-raymond-kelly-cant-wait-around-for-the-fbi/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NYPD Commissioner Raymond Kelly: No time to wait&#160;for FBI in terror arrest &#8211; NY Daily News Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly said the NYPD busted a lone-wolf terror suspect without the FBI because it didn&#8217;t want to waste any time. Related articles, courtesy of Zemanta: FBI Declined to Pursue NYC Bomber, NYPD Went at it Alone [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/11/21/nypds-raymond-kelly-cant-wait-around-for-the-fbi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Newest Hardline Protestor Threat to Police</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/11/21/the-newest-hardline-protestor-threat-to-police/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/11/21/the-newest-hardline-protestor-threat-to-police/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Rosenfeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties and Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State and Local]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=12370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The newest threat to police from hardline protestors is “doxing” – the photographing of police and publishing their personal details, and sometimes that of their families, to the Internet. This tactic has been used to attempt to intimidate officers during events with protestors calling out officers’ names as they film and telling them they will be “doxed.” This tactic is an import from the hardline protest movements in Britain and should be of significant concern to police at all levels of operations and command, although it does have a very simple remedy.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/11/21/the-newest-hardline-protestor-threat-to-police/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tom Ridge and Penn State Potential</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/11/10/tom-ridge-and-penn-state-potential/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/11/10/tom-ridge-and-penn-state-potential/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Management and Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State and Local]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=12332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the news broke yesterday with rumors and news reports that former DHS Secretary Tom Ridge could be in the running to be the next President of Penn State, I have to admit to some very mixed feelings. They weren’t negative mixed feelings but rather selfish ones. As one of the people fortunate enough to serve under Ridge in the early days of DHS, I got to observe one of the most dynamic individuals I’ve ever met in my life. If his move to Penn State should come to pass, the institution will gain someone who not only can navigate the most dangerous of seas but bring people together in service in ways never done before. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/11/10/tom-ridge-and-penn-state-potential/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ATF chief, Arizona prosecutor resign amid gun inquiries</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/30/atf-chief-arizona-prosecutor-resign-amid-gun-inquiries/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/30/atf-chief-arizona-prosecutor-resign-amid-gun-inquiries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Border Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management and Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smuggling and Trafficking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State and Local]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/30/atf-chief-arizona-prosecutor-resign-amid-gun-inquiries/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ATF chief, Arizona prosecutor resign amid gun inquiries &#8211; USATODAY.com The acting director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and Arizona&#8217;s top federal prosecutor resigned Tuesday in the midst of congressional and Justice Department inquiries into a controversial gun trafficking investigation that allowed hundreds of firearms to fall into the hands of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/30/atf-chief-arizona-prosecutor-resign-amid-gun-inquiries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After Earthquake, DC Government Needs Lesson in Social Media</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/24/dc-government-and-social-media/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/24/dc-government-and-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 19:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Battle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emergency Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR, Social Media and Govt 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety and Physical Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State and Local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=11818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever tried to get on Twitter only to find that frustrating white whale floating in a sea of blue with the message that the network is overcrowded and you should come back later? In the social media world, this is known as the Fail Whale. During yesterday's mini emergency in Washington, when a 5.8 earthquake shook the city and sent scared and confused folks fleeing from buildings, we experienced a Fail Whale on the part of the Washington DC, government. Increasingly, citizens aren't turning to government officials for disaster management but to one another. And they're doing it through social media. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/24/dc-government-and-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Homeland Security Advisory Council: Empowering Critical Infrastructure and National Resilience</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/06/28/homeland-security-advisory-council-empowering-critical-infrastructure-and-national-resilience/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/06/28/homeland-security-advisory-council-empowering-critical-infrastructure-and-national-resilience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Gaynor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critical Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management and Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety and Physical Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State and Local]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=11468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, the Homeland Security Advisory Council (HSAC) released the recommendations of its Community Resilience Task Force (CRTF), which argue that it is impossible to build a resilient nation upon protected yet aged, overstressed, exploitable and consequence-amplifying infrastructure foundations. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/06/28/homeland-security-advisory-council-empowering-critical-infrastructure-and-national-resilience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disharmony in the Home Team</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/06/28/disharmony-in-the-home-team/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/06/28/disharmony-in-the-home-team/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Carafano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Counter Terrorism and Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State and Local]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=11452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is hard to argue that local, state, and federal counterterrorism operations are not still a work in progress. While working together, law enforcement agencies at all levels have combined to thwart a number of plots since 9/11, many challenges that frustrate cooperation still perplex the national counterterrorism enterprise. The remedy is a new organizational culture that places a premium on building trust and confidence between federal, state, and local counterterrorism efforts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/06/28/disharmony-in-the-home-team/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will San Francisco Ever Get It?</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/06/17/will-san-francisco-ever-get-it/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/06/17/will-san-francisco-ever-get-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marty Ficke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military and Homeland Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State and Local]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=11412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[San Francisco is beautiful, historic and diverse. But as nice as that city is, I remain disturbed by its anti-military reputation. The SF Police and Human Rights Commission held hearings on Joint Terrorism Task Force operations in San Francisco. The hearings specifically addressed the FBI Domestic Investigations and Operations Guidelines that allow the JTTF to commence an investigation/surveillance without a direct nexus to criminal activity. I wonder if residents of San Francisco and the SFPD will ever "get it."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/06/17/will-san-francisco-ever-get-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
