<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Security Debrief &#187; WMD, Chemical and Biological</title>
	<atom:link href="http://securitydebrief.com/category/wmd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://securitydebrief.com</link>
	<description>Homland security news and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:26:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Only in Washington &#8211; Regulations Proposed as Way to Fix Failed Regulations</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/08/31/only-in-washington-regulations-proposed-as-way-to-fix-failed-regulations/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/08/31/only-in-washington-regulations-proposed-as-way-to-fix-failed-regulations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critical Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management and Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD, Chemical and Biological]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=13667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent op-ed, Christine Todd Whitman, the former head of the EPA, proposed greater regulation of the U.S. chemical sector because the current regulations aren’t working. Gov. Whitman is right on one thing: the current system isn’t working, but it is not because of a lack of regulation. Chemical companies have tried, but DHS isn’t keeping up]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/08/31/only-in-washington-regulations-proposed-as-way-to-fix-failed-regulations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Water and Chemical Security &#8211; Whitman Got it Wrong</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/08/30/water-and-chemical-security-whitman-got-it-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/08/30/water-and-chemical-security-whitman-got-it-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 21:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>L. Vance Taylor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critical Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety and Physical Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD, Chemical and Biological]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=13659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, the New York Times ran an editorial by Christine Todd Whitman, titled “The Chemical Threat to America.”  In the op-ed, the author calls on the Administration to expand and implement chemical security regulations in the water sector as a means to protect America. She advocates that the federal government should be able to mandate chemical processes and force water systems to use so-called Inherently Safer Technologies.  Ms. Whitman is smart and capable, but on this issue she is wrong, wrong, wrong.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/08/30/water-and-chemical-security-whitman-got-it-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chemical Security (CFATS) Bogged Down in Congress Due to Lack of Action</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/01/23/chemical-security-cfats-bogged-down-in-congress-due-to-lack-of-action/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/01/23/chemical-security-cfats-bogged-down-in-congress-due-to-lack-of-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD, Chemical and Biological]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/2012/01/23/chemical-security-cfats-bogged-down-in-congress-due-to-lack-of-action/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CQ Homeland Security&#160;(subscription required) Chemical facility security is getting bogged down in Congress, due, evidently, from lack of energy (energy &#8211; get it? no one?): A set of bills that would extend the federal government&#8217;s ability to assess chemical facility security have never had a clear path to enactment, largely due to longstanding disagreements between [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2012/01/23/chemical-security-cfats-bogged-down-in-congress-due-to-lack-of-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foreign Affairs: Send in the troops to Iran to stop nuke program</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/11/10/foreign-affairs-send-in-the-troops-to-iran-to-stop-nuke-program/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/11/10/foreign-affairs-send-in-the-troops-to-iran-to-stop-nuke-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 23:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military and Homeland Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD, Chemical and Biological]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/2011/11/10/foreign-affairs-send-in-the-troops-to-iran-to-stop-nuke-program/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why Obama Should Take Out Iran&#8217;s Nuclear Program &#124; Foreign Affairs According to the recent IAEA report, Iran is closer to having nuclear weapons that was widely assumed. Once it does goes nuclear, Tehran will be almost impossible to stop. To prevent it, the Obama administration must use military force&#8211;and soon.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/11/10/foreign-affairs-send-in-the-troops-to-iran-to-stop-nuke-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Airborne Chemical Releases: Ninety Tons of Trouble Blowin&#8217; in the Wind</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/10/27/airborne-chemical-releases-ninety-tons-of-trouble-blowin-in-the-wind/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/10/27/airborne-chemical-releases-ninety-tons-of-trouble-blowin-in-the-wind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emergency Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD, Chemical and Biological]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/2011/10/27/airborne-chemical-releases-ninety-tons-of-trouble-blowin-in-the-wind/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DHS &#124; Modeling Airborne Chemical Releases: Ninety Tons of Trouble Blowin&#8217; in the Wind How do DHS experimenters release 4,000 pounds of deadly gas in 1 minute? Very, very carefully.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/10/27/airborne-chemical-releases-ninety-tons-of-trouble-blowin-in-the-wind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Isn’t Ready for Large Biological Attack</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/10/18/u-s-isn%e2%80%99t-ready-for-large-biological-attack/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/10/18/u-s-isn%e2%80%99t-ready-for-large-biological-attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 03:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD, Chemical and Biological]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/2011/10/18/u-s-isn%e2%80%99t-ready-for-large-biological-attack/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Isn&#8217;t Ready for Large Biological Attack, Officials Say &#8211; Businessweek The U.S. isn&#8217;t prepared to respond to a pandemic or large biological attack, federal officials said. &#8220;We&#8217;re not ready for a global catastrophe involving&#8221; a pathogen, Tara O&#8217;Toole, undersecretary for science and technology at the Department of Homeland Security, said today at a Senate [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/10/18/u-s-isn%e2%80%99t-ready-for-large-biological-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weapons of Mass Destruction &#8211; A Dangerous and Uncertain Future</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/25/weapons-of-mass-destruction-a-dangerous-and-uncertain-future/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/25/weapons-of-mass-destruction-a-dangerous-and-uncertain-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Counter Terrorism and Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD, Chemical and Biological]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=11826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The present, predominant view that Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) is confined to Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and High Yield Explosives (CBRNE) only is now passé.  Many people do not even include the “E”.  This is far too narrow a view! At least two other categories must be included in the pantheon of WMD. These are cyber weapons and economic warfare.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/25/weapons-of-mass-destruction-a-dangerous-and-uncertain-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National EMP Awareness Day: The Threat that Can’t Be Ignored</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/10/national-emp-awareness-day-the-threat-that-can%e2%80%99t-be-ignored/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/10/national-emp-awareness-day-the-threat-that-can%e2%80%99t-be-ignored/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Carafano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counter Terrorism and Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management and Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD, Chemical and Biological]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=11719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attack - produced by a nuclear weapon detonated at a high altitude or by a geomagnetic storm - has the potential to decimate America’s electrical and technological infrastructure. The Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse Attack found that an EMP is a threat to our society and military. Yet, despite broad consensus, Congress has yet to act in a substantive manner. For the most part, U.S. government agencies have not taken planning for their response to an EMP attack out of the theoretical stages.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/10/national-emp-awareness-day-the-threat-that-can%e2%80%99t-be-ignored/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Retrospective Look at Chem-Bio Terrorism</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/02/a-retrospective-look-at-chem-bio-terrorism/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/02/a-retrospective-look-at-chem-bio-terrorism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Counter Terrorism and Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD, Chemical and Biological]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=11676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Center for a New American Security released an excellent study - “Aum Shinrikyo: Insights Into How Terrorists Develop Biological and Chemical Weapons.” The result is a superb history of a singular event in modern terrorism history - the Sarin nerve gas attack on Tokyo in 1995. The CNAS team shows how a small group of dedicated loyalists can pull off some acts that many “experts” still persist in saying only nation states can do and highlight that sixteen years later, still facing a threat from terrorists, we need to learn more from this incident.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/08/02/a-retrospective-look-at-chem-bio-terrorism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Great Illusion</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/04/14/the-great-illusion/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/04/14/the-great-illusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randall Larsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WMD, Chemical and Biological]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=10693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent Washington Examiner column, Gene Healy, a vice president at the Cato Institute, suggests that we worry too much about serious threats to national security. He posits that we are in an era of great peace and stability. To downplay the threat of bioterrorism, Mr. Healy quotes Milton Leitenberg from the University of Maryland: “The idea that four guys in a cave are going to create bioweapons from scratch — that will be never, ever, ever.” The statements of both Mr. Healy and Mr. Leitenberg require rebuttal.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/04/14/the-great-illusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYC &#8220;Dirty Bomb&#8221; Drill Hailed as Success</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/04/12/nyc-dirty-bomb-drill-hailed-as-success/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/04/12/nyc-dirty-bomb-drill-hailed-as-success/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emergency Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety and Physical Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State and Local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD, Chemical and Biological]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=10677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NYC "Dirty Bomb" Drill Hailed as Success - GSN
A large-scale antiterrorism drill last week met its goal of preventing any mock radiological "dirty bombs" from being smuggled into New York City, Newsday reported on Tuesday.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/04/12/nyc-dirty-bomb-drill-hailed-as-success/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House Unveils Presidential Policy Directive on National Preparedness</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/04/07/white-house-unveils-presidential-policy-directive-on-national-preparedness/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/04/07/white-house-unveils-presidential-policy-directive-on-national-preparedness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Kaniewski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Counter Terrorism and Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety and Physical Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD, Chemical and Biological]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=10653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please join the GW Homeland Security Policy Institute for a discussion about Presidential Policy Directive – 8: National Preparedness, featuring Brian Kamoie, Senior Director for Preparedness Policy on the White House National Security Staff. President Barack Obama signed a new Presidential Policy Directive on National Preparedness last week and the Directive will be publicly released at this event. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/04/07/white-house-unveils-presidential-policy-directive-on-national-preparedness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Bills Set Up (Another) Potential Jurisdiction Fight Over Homeland Security</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/04/02/house-bills-set-up-another-potential-jurisdiction-fight-over-homeland-security/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/04/02/house-bills-set-up-another-potential-jurisdiction-fight-over-homeland-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 18:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD, Chemical and Biological]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/2011/04/02/house-bills-set-up-another-potential-jurisdiction-fight-over-homeland-security/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House Bills Set Up Potential Jurisdiction Fight Over Chemical Security &#8211; NYTimes.com In an unexpected twist, two House committees may find themselves in a jurisdiction fight over dueling bills to reauthorize the country&#8217;s program to secure chemical facilities against terrorist attacks and thefts. Members of both the House Homeland Security Committee and House Energy and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/04/02/house-bills-set-up-another-potential-jurisdiction-fight-over-homeland-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FDA to Monitor Radiation Levels of Japanese Seafood: Uh Oh!</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/03/24/fda-to-monitor-radiation-levels-of-japanese-seafood-uh-oh/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/03/24/fda-to-monitor-radiation-levels-of-japanese-seafood-uh-oh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest Contributor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emergency Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD, Chemical and Biological]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.com/?p=10458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Doug Doan
The FDA has decided to start monitoring the radiation levels of Japanse Exports. No doubt the announcement was carefully constructed to make Americans feel better about the food they eat, while simultaneously reminding everyone that the FDA is on the job of food safety.   It might just work too.  Most Americans, have absolutely no idea how products are screening at our various Ports of Entry before they enter the United States. But for anyone that has been around a bit, the FDA announcement can only be viewed with intense skepticism. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2011/03/24/fda-to-monitor-radiation-levels-of-japanese-seafood-uh-oh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latest Terror Threat in US Aimed to Poison Food</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2010/12/29/latest-terror-threat-in-us-aimed-to-poison-food/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2010/12/29/latest-terror-threat-in-us-aimed-to-poison-food/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 19:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD, Chemical and Biological]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.adfero.com/2010/12/29/latest-terror-threat-in-us-aimed-to-poison-food/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest Terror Threat in US Aimed to Poison Food &#8211; CBS Evening News &#8211; CBS News In this exclusive story, CBS News chief investigative correspondent Armen Keteyian reports the latest terror attack to America involves the possible use of poisons &#8211; simultaneous attacks targeting hotels and restaurants at many locations over a single weekend. A [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2010/12/29/latest-terror-threat-in-us-aimed-to-poison-food/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Winds of War</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2010/11/29/the-winds-of-war/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2010/11/29/the-winds-of-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest Contributor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Counter Terrorism and Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management and Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military and Homeland Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD, Chemical and Biological]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.adfero.com/?p=9332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Peter Probst
Here is an excerpt from an article to be published in the winter edition of the magazine, “Inside Homeland Security.” I recently returned from Israel where I had been invited to speak at the World Wide Counter-Terrorism Summit. An issue that dominated much of the discussions concerned the threat of a nuclear Iran, and how Israel and the US would likely respond to the challenge. Virtually every Israeli I spoke to was adamant that Iran could not be permitted to go nuclear. There was less certainty as to the degree and nature of support Israel could expect from its friends and allies.  ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2010/11/29/the-winds-of-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Darpa Wants To Sniff Your City’s Distinct Chemical Scent</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2010/11/11/darpa-wants-to-sniff-your-city%e2%80%99s-distinct-chemical-scent/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2010/11/11/darpa-wants-to-sniff-your-city%e2%80%99s-distinct-chemical-scent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties and Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD, Chemical and Biological]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.adfero.com/?p=9141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Darpa Wants To Sniff Your City’s Distinct Chemical Scent - Wired Danger Room
Don't panic. But there's a non-trivial chance terrorists will launch a chemical-weapons attack on U.S. soil. 
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2010/11/11/darpa-wants-to-sniff-your-city%e2%80%99s-distinct-chemical-scent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Concerns over bioterrorism grow</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2010/10/26/concerns-over-bioterrorism-grow/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2010/10/26/concerns-over-bioterrorism-grow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counter Terrorism and Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD, Chemical and Biological]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.adfero.com/?p=8835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Concerns over bioterrorism grow - Homeland Security Newswire
Recent concern about the growing threat of bioterrorism attacks that could strike cities throughout the world has led governments, militaries, and the biopharmaceutical industry to a heightened state of alert.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2010/10/26/concerns-over-bioterrorism-grow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security Experts Say No Nuclear Option for Al Qaeda</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2010/10/13/security-experts-say-no-nuclear-option-for-al-qaeda/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2010/10/13/security-experts-say-no-nuclear-option-for-al-qaeda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Counter Terrorism and Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD, Chemical and Biological]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.adfero.com/?p=8733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Security Experts Say No Nuclear Option for Al Qaeda - CQ Homeland Security
The nightmare scenario that keeps homeland security officials awake at night — the detonation of a nuclear bomb on U.S. soil — is unlikely enough to be safely relegated to the land of dreams, a pair of prominent security experts said Tuesday at a Capitol Hill forum.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2010/10/13/security-experts-say-no-nuclear-option-for-al-qaeda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regulators: N.J. nuclear plant employee was an Islamic jihadist</title>
		<link>http://securitydebrief.com/2010/10/06/regulators-n-j-nuclear-plant-employee-was-an-islamic-jihadist/</link>
		<comments>http://securitydebrief.com/2010/10/06/regulators-n-j-nuclear-plant-employee-was-an-islamic-jihadist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 19:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Media Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Counter Terrorism and Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management and Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD, Chemical and Biological]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitydebrief.adfero.com/?p=8708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regulators: N.J. nuclear plant employee was an Islamic jihadist - Homeland Security Newswire
A New Jersey man accused of joining al Qaeda in Yemen spoke openly of militant views while working at American nuclear plants, according to a report by the inspector general of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) that proposes tightening personnel security rules.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitydebrief.com/2010/10/06/regulators-n-j-nuclear-plant-employee-was-an-islamic-jihadist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
